#CANARY MAIL SPELL CHECK PASSWORD#
#CANARY MAIL SPELL CHECK FREE#

I’m no international privacy expert but the Australian laws, like their UK counterparts, sound very worrying. in light of the Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Act 2018, or ASS law as Australians criticis like to call it, are your Australian servers at risk of seizure or orders to log individual accounts?

I do have a question tho sparked by this comment about Australia: And having a free, unlimited option with still reasonable speed will seem like a miracle for colleagues in developing countries, especially. As an independent (read, unemployed) journalist, even a few extra dollars for this or that service (phone, net, website hosting, email, antivirus etc) soon add up.

#CANARY MAIL SPELL CHECK FREE#

Just discovered your free VPN and after enjoying the 7 day trial, can only express delighted amazement at the speed reached by the free offering. Thanks in advance for the answers, and keep up great work!

#CANARY MAIL SPELL CHECK PASSWORD#

Back to Mani’s question, what would be your response if you would received a valid Swiss court order to:Ģ.1 Reveal username and password for account with email address: ?Ģ.2 Reveal email and password for account with username: some_user ?Ģ.3 Check and report if user with username: some_user is registered in your service?Ģ.4 Check and report if user with email: is registered in your service? But if this is the case, then it is quite pointless to use ProtonVPN without Secure Core.Ģ. connecting first to ProtonVPN server in Switzerland) then even if logs from server in Canada will be exposed, everything that they will reveal is connection to Secure Core server in Switzerland (which operates under Swiss laws and thus is not obligated to save connection logs). What happens if I am connecting to a ProtonVPN server (again, directly – without Secure Core) that is located in Canada wouldn’t the Canadian law be in power there (since physical location of the server is in Canada)?ġ.2 In case if I am connecting to ProtonVPN server in Canada, but using Secure Core now (i.e. But wouldn’t that only apply if all the servers were in Switzerland? Here are some elaborations, to illustrate what I mean:ġ.1 If I am using a ProtonVPN server (connecting to it directly – without Secure Core) that is located in Switzerland – then it is obvious that Swiss law is applied here.

In all the places you are referring to “Swiss privacy laws” (that you are “not obligated to save connection logs” etc.). I do have a couple of questions, concerning you VPN service:ġ. However, as we do not have any customer IP information, we could not provide the requested information and this was explained to the requesting party.įirst of all, thank you for a great job you have done with ProtonVPN and ProtonMail ! January 2019 – A data request from a foreign country was approved by the Swiss court system. Furthermore, under Swiss law, a Warrant Canary is not meaningful, because under Swiss law, the target of a surveillance or data request must always be eventually notified, so they have the opportunity to contest the data request.Ī listing of notable legal requests is provided below: Therefore, we are unable to comply with requests for user connection logs, even if they are legally binding. Under Swiss law, Proton VPN is not obligated to save connection logs, and we adhere to a strict no-logs VPN policy. Under Swiss data protection regulations, we cannot legally comply with foreign requests that are not supported by a Swiss court order. The only legally binding requests are ones from the Swiss courts that we are legally obligated to comply with. To be counted here as a legal request for information, the request must come through official channels foreign or domestic (either a court order, directly from a government entity, or from legal/security departments of corporations). This post was last updated on May 29, 2020. This page is updated whenever there is a notable new legal request.

Canary mail spell check